Green puffs the magic dragon
Green, 68, also said she opposed any proposal to give the mayor's office "oversight, control or appointment authority" over the school board. Mayor Jerry Jennings has a long history of being at odds with the board and has supported a proposal that would give him a voice on it.
Well then. I'm not saying these things are contradictory - they technically aren't. You could come up with a lot of good programs and implement them without any power over the school board. But two things come to mind:
#1) It'd be a lot easier to implement them if you had some power on the school board - what do you do when the school board is at odds with you? I guess you dump the programs? Doubtful.
#2) Obviously, it's not like Green has any principled problem with the mayor defining policies at the public schools - she clearly wants to be a player in public education in the city, and that's a good thing. It's rather ridiculous for her to pretend that she doesn't want to influence the board. This is just a poor attempt at good politics - attacking Jennings for something that she'd be just as guilty of doing. What mayor doesn't want control over everything?
Why not just come out and say it? That it would be a good thing if the mayor - who has a lot of power the board doesn't - could have a little more than persuasion over the school board. It's obvious that both the Tanman and Green want to influence the public schools - would it be so bad to structure things so they could? I could be convinced, but I don't think so. Oh wait, here's this problem:
This is just fairweather federalism under a differnet guise. Not that I mind the attacks on Jennings, I don't think his education policy is particular sound.